AI-Powered Extraction

LLM Scraping Where Rules Break Down

Combine traditional scraping with LLM-powered extraction to collect structured data from unstructured, irregular, and complex web content — where rule-based parsers fail. Entity extraction, relationship mapping, and schema-driven data collection from any web source.

Any
Page Structure
96%+
Extraction Accuracy
Custom
Output Schema
Cost
Optimised Pipelines
◆ Enterprise Ready◆ SOC 2 Aware◆ GDPR Compliant◆ 99.9% Uptime◆ Global Coverage◆ 24/7 Monitoring◆ API-First◆ Managed Service◆ Real-Time Data◆ Custom Schemas◆ Bengaluru HQ◆ Enterprise Ready◆ SOC 2 Aware◆ GDPR Compliant◆ 99.9% Uptime◆ Global Coverage◆ 24/7 Monitoring◆ API-First◆ Managed Service◆ Real-Time Data◆ Custom Schemas◆ Bengaluru HQ
What & Why

What is LLM-Assisted Web Scraping?

LLM-assisted web scraping combines traditional HTML extraction with large language model inference to extract structured data from web content that rule-based parsers cannot reliably handle. Conventional scrapers work by identifying specific HTML elements — a price in a span with a given class, a title in an h1 tag — and extracting their text. This works well for consistently structured pages. It fails completely when pages are irregular, content is embedded in free text, the same information appears in different formats across pages, or the data to be extracted requires semantic understanding rather than pattern matching.

The practical scope of this problem is large. Company information pages describe team size, founding date, and products in narrative prose — not structured HTML fields. Legal filings contain party names, dates, and financial figures embedded in formal document text. Job descriptions mention required skills, compensation, and seniority in unstructured paragraphs. News articles contain entity mentions, event relationships, and factual claims that only become structured data through semantic extraction. For all of these, an LLM instruction prompt — 'extract company name, founding year, headcount, and products from this text as JSON' — dramatically outperforms any feasible rule-based approach.

DataFlirt's LLM scraping pipelines are engineered for cost-efficiency as well as accuracy. LLM inference at scraping scale is expensive if not carefully designed. We use a tiered approach: traditional extraction first for any fields that can be extracted reliably with rules, LLM inference only for fields where rules fail or confidence is low, with model selection optimised for the accuracy-cost tradeoff of each use case. For high-volume pipelines, smaller instruction-tuned models handle straightforward extraction tasks while larger models are reserved for complex understanding requirements.

The output of LLM-assisted scraping is structured JSON conforming to your defined schema — with confidence scores for extracted fields, source attribution, and optional reasoning traces. This makes the output directly usable in downstream data pipelines without additional transformation, and the confidence scores allow you to flag low-confidence extractions for human review rather than silently accepting errors.

When to Use LLM-Assisted Extraction
📄
Unstructured Page Content
Company pages, about sections, and narrative web content where data is in prose rather than predictable HTML fields.
📑
Document & PDF Extraction
Annual reports, legal filings, and policy documents where structured data is embedded in formal document text.
🔗
Relationship Extraction
Extracting entities and the relationships between them from news articles, filings, and web content.
🌐
Inconsistent Page Structures
Sites where the same data appears in different formats across pages — defeating any single CSS selector strategy.
🎯
High-Value Low-Volume Extraction
Where extraction accuracy is critical and volume is low enough that LLM inference cost per record is acceptable.
Capabilities

Everything You Need

Comprehensive extraction built for reliability, accuracy, and scale.

🤖
Schema-Driven LLM Extraction

Define your output schema as a JSON structure and our pipeline instructs the LLM to extract exactly those fields from any page content.

🔗
Entity & Relationship Extraction

Extract named entities — companies, people, locations, products — and the relationships between them from unstructured web text.

📄
Document & PDF Understanding

LLM-assisted extraction from PDF annual reports, legal documents, and policy files where layout-aware parsing alone is insufficient.

💡
Confidence Scoring

Every extracted field comes with a confidence score, enabling you to route low-confidence records to human review rather than accepting silent errors.

💰
Cost-Optimised Pipelines

Tiered extraction architecture uses rules for reliable fields and LLM inference only where needed — minimising token cost per record.

🔍
Hybrid Rule + LLM Pipelines

Traditional scraping handles structured elements; LLM inference handles the remainder — combining speed and cost efficiency with semantic capability.

Data Fields

What We Extract

Every field you need, structured and ready to use downstream.

Extracted EntityField ValueConfidence ScoreSource URLModel UsedPrompt TokensExtraction MethodSchema VersionReasoning TraceCompany NameFounded YearHeadcountProductsRelationshipsEventDateAmountLocationPersonRole
Process

How Our LLM Scraping Pipeline Works

A proven process that turns any source into clean structured data — reliably.

01
Define Output Schema
Specify the fields you want extracted as a JSON schema. We use this to engineer the extraction prompt and validate outputs.
02
Traditional Extraction First
Rule-based extraction attempts to populate fields from predictable HTML structure — handling the easy cases without LLM cost.
03
LLM Inference for Remainder
Fields that rules cannot reliably extract are passed to an LLM with the page text and a structured extraction prompt.
04
Validation & Confidence Scoring
Extracted values validated against schema constraints and scored for confidence. Low-confidence records flagged for review.
05
Structured Delivery
JSON output conforming to your schema delivered with source attribution, confidence scores, and extraction method metadata.
Sample Output
response.json
{
  "status":        "success",
  "method":        "llm_assisted_extraction",
  "model":         "gpt-4o-mini",
  "source_url":    "example-unstructured-site.com",
  "prompt_tokens": 1840,
  "extracted": {
    "company":     "Acme Technologies",
    "founded":     "2018",
    "headcount":   "120-150",
    "products":    ["CloudSync","DataBridge"],
    "hq":          "Bengaluru, India",
    "confidence":  0.96
  }
}
Technical Stack

Enterprise-Grade Infrastructure

Built on proven open-source tools and cloud infrastructure — no vendor lock-in.

🤖
Pydantic + instructor Integration

instructor library enforces structured JSON output from LLM responses — eliminating free-text parsing and schema validation failures.

💰
Model Cost Optimisation

Routing logic selects the smallest capable model per extraction task — GPT-4o-mini for simple fields, GPT-4o or Claude for complex reasoning.

🔗
LangChain Pipeline Orchestration

LangChain orchestrates multi-step extraction pipelines — content fetching, chunking, LLM inference, and output validation in a single managed workflow.

📄
Document Chunking

Long documents chunked intelligently at semantic boundaries before LLM inference — preserving context while respecting token limits.

Async Batch Processing

Async LLM API calls with intelligent batching maximise throughput while respecting rate limits across OpenAI and Anthropic APIs.

🎯
Prompt Engineering

Extraction prompts engineered and tested per use case — with few-shot examples, schema injection, and chain-of-thought for complex extractions.

Tools & Technologies
PythonPlaywrightScrapyaiohttptrafilaturaOpenAI APIAnthropic APILangChaininstructorpydanticspaCyRedisPostgreSQLMongoDBAWS LambdaDockerParquetAirflow
Use Cases

Built for Every Team

From solo analysts to enterprise data teams — here's how organizations use this data.

01
Company Intelligence from About Pages
Extract founding year, headcount, products, and leadership from company websites where data is in unstructured narrative content.
02
Legal Document Data Extraction
Extract party names, dates, financial figures, and operative clauses from court judgments and regulatory filings.
03
Financial Report Structuring
Extract revenue, EBITDA, guidance, and risk factors from annual report PDF prose sections that tabular extraction misses.
04
News Entity & Event Extraction
Extract company mentions, financial events, M&A signals, and sentiment from news articles at scale for investment intelligence.
05
Product Description Standardisation
Extract specifications, compatibility, and feature attributes from inconsistently formatted product descriptions across different retailers.
06
Job Description Skill Parsing
Extract required skills, seniority indicators, compensation signals, and team descriptions from free-text job postings.

The Web Is 80% Unstructured — LLMs Changed What Is Extractable

Rule-based scrapers can handle the structured minority of the web well. The unstructured majority — narrative company pages, legal documents, news articles, analyst reports — historically required expensive human review to extract structured intelligence from. LLM-assisted extraction changes this equation: DataFlirt pipelines now extract structured data from any web content with accuracy that approaches human review, at machine speed and cost.

Pricing

Simple, Scalable Pricing

Start free and scale as your data needs grow.

Starter
$99/mo

For small teams and projects getting started with data.

  • 50,000 records/month
  • 5 data sources
  • Daily refresh
  • JSON & CSV export
  • Email support
Get Started
Enterprise
Custom

For large organizations with custom requirements.

  • Unlimited records
  • Dedicated infrastructure
  • Real-time delivery
  • SLA guarantees
  • Account manager
  • Custom integrations
Contact Sales
FAQ

Common Questions

Everything you need to know before getting started.

Which LLMs do you use for extraction?
Primarily OpenAI GPT-4o-mini for cost-efficient structured extraction, GPT-4o for complex reasoning tasks, and Anthropic Claude for long-document extraction. Model selection is optimised per use case and configured transparently.
How accurate is LLM extraction compared to rule-based scraping?
For structured pages with consistent HTML, rule-based extraction is faster and cheaper. For unstructured or irregular content, LLM extraction typically achieves 94-97% accuracy versus 60-80% for the best achievable rule-based approach.
How do you manage LLM inference costs at scale?
Tiered routing uses rules for reliable fields and LLM only for fields that rules cannot handle. Smaller, cheaper models handle straightforward extraction. Batch API calls where available. Caching for repeated similar content.
Can you extract relationships between entities, not just individual fields?
Yes. Relationship extraction — who acquired whom, which executive joined which company, which regulation applies to which product — is a supported use case with appropriate prompt engineering.
Is the output schema flexible?
Completely. You define the JSON schema you need. We engineer the extraction prompt and validation logic to match it.
How do you handle long documents that exceed context windows?
Long documents are chunked at semantic boundaries — paragraph or section level — with context overlap to preserve meaning across chunk boundaries. Multiple chunks are processed and results merged.
Get Started

Ready to Start Collecting LLM Scraping Data?

Join data teams worldwide using DataFlirt to power products, research, and operations with reliable, structured web data.

Services

Data Extraction for Every Industry

View All Services →